Skip to content

Modern myth-makers

That’s what scientists are: the myth-makers of today. Strings and quarks, anti-matter and boson particles: what are they but the earth, wind, water, and fire of our age – speculated entities imagined precisely in order to resolve gaps in our theories. They represent magically endowed values reinforcing our expectations and hopes, or, more prosaically, laboratory-concocted guesses about the mysteries lying behind real-world dissonances.

We imagine that we are opening new frontiers with these investigations. But if we look more closely, we sometimes find ourselves merely giving surface expression to deep cultural undercurrents carrying us, unaware, pell-mell along with them.

Does God rule, or Chance, Marcus Aurelius asked, and if the latter, by what standards shall we guide our actions? That becomes the real question we ask today, and it points to the real stakes hanging on the answer.

And the truth is that we needn’t be quantum or particle physicists to find ourselves grappling with these profound uncertainties, or gambling with the equally profound consequences of the conclusions we propose for them. We can be doctors and lawyers, police and politicians, diplomats and soldiers. We can be anyone, in any field of life.

We can be, indeed, managers and executives. The assumptions we make about our roles and how they ought to be carried out are quite as momentous in our own lives and those of  our contemporaries as those made by any philosopher or actor in any field. But, it is worth remembering, they also are just as provisional.

Dissonances, as it happens, are much like questions: we usually discover that the very effort to resolve any one of them has, perversely, raised more.

So, let’s take a look at what this might mean for us in management – how the dilemma might affect us, our colleagues, our enterprises – and even our societies.

See you tomorrow!

Today’s tip: Speaking of uncertainty, please see Fred H. Schiegel on how to deal with the paradoxes it presents.

Why not try out this feature provided here by Answers.com: If you double-click on any (non-hypertext-linked) word on the main page of the site, a window will open providing definitions or encyclopedic material about that term, together with links to additional sources of information. Try it out – it’s interesting and fun.

And, of course, while you’re clicking around, don’t forget to click on your choice of an email or RSS-feed subscription to these pages – we’ll be proud to have you join us!

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sphere: Related Content

2 Comments

  1. Hi Jim, Thank you for the link. Your discussion here over the past few weeks has raised some interesting questions for me and related to the topic I’m working on. Of particular interest has been the questions around how are we evaluating leadership – are we falling for false correlations/cause effect connections because of our focus on success and are we even studying how often ‘best practices’ fail? Very good questions that would help drive some faddish ideas away, I would hope. When you look at the current financial meltdown it appears that a significant amount of error came from managers relying on formulas and risk models that they did not have the time (or gumption) to understand. Piling on because it seemed that profits were easy and everyone couldn’t be wrong established work habits and business practices that in hindsight were nuts. Admittedly, an extreme example of how following a high impact path without adequate understanding of the uncertainty underpinning your assumptions can cause failure, but one that I think has relevance to the idea of pursuing leadership strategies that seem wrong for you, simply because they were right for others.

    Monday, July 27, 2009 at 7:46 pm | Permalink
  2. Jim Stroup wrote:

    Hi Fred,

    Thanks for these thoughtful comments. The relationship between the current economic situation and both the leadership formulas that may have contributed to it and that are being proposed as solutions to it is one we do indeed, I think, need to consider more carefully.

    Thanks again for stopping by with this – but especially for your own work and fascinating writing!

    Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 8:48 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*

Bad Behavior has blocked 257 access attempts in the last 7 days.