<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodness me!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://managingleadership.com/blog/index.php/2009/02/23/goodness-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2009/02/23/goodness-me/</link>
	<description>The strategic role of the senior executive</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:35:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Stroup</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2009/02/23/goodness-me/comment-page-1/#comment-8354</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Stroup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/?p=1917#comment-8354</guid>
		<description>Hello Hayli,

The jury is still out on Obama. He does seem to have a frank and reassuring way of projecting an approach that is more practical than ideological - I sure hope events prove that out.

There is some genuine concern from points all along the political spectrum that there is a tendency by him and his inner circle to reserve the option to assess others&#039; intentions and behavior to themselves, and to ascribe improbably destructive and selfish motives to others.

I also expect that we will see more of this sort of commentary from quarters where we may not have expected it because of the particular way this administration is handling the press.

But for all that, I agree that he is concerned about being isolated and set up for a fall. That is an astute and promising attitude. Best of luck to him in that effort!

Great comments - thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Hayli,</p>
<p>The jury is still out on Obama. He does seem to have a frank and reassuring way of projecting an approach that is more practical than ideological &#8211; I sure hope events prove that out.</p>
<p>There is some genuine concern from points all along the political spectrum that there is a tendency by him and his inner circle to reserve the option to assess others&#8217; intentions and behavior to themselves, and to ascribe improbably destructive and selfish motives to others.</p>
<p>I also expect that we will see more of this sort of commentary from quarters where we may not have expected it because of the particular way this administration is handling the press.</p>
<p>But for all that, I agree that he is concerned about being isolated and set up for a fall. That is an astute and promising attitude. Best of luck to him in that effort!</p>
<p>Great comments &#8211; thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayli @ Rise Smart</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2009/02/23/goodness-me/comment-page-1/#comment-8348</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayli @ Rise Smart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/?p=1917#comment-8348</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link to the Maureen Dowd column. I disagree w/ her analysis of Obama&#039;s current temperament. While his handling of stimulus money may not gain my full agreement, I appreciate seeing him in interviews saying it just might not work. It&#039;s the realistic, honest approach that Americans are craving now. Besides, the man has to manage expectations because everyone has put him on a huge pedestal, a phenomenon you described in your post. I&#039;ve seen him continually downplay that phenomenon, at least with his words. I think he&#039;s trying his best to avoid letting others prop him up on the wave crest, so that if/when he falls, it won&#039;t engulf him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link to the Maureen Dowd column. I disagree w/ her analysis of Obama&#8217;s current temperament. While his handling of stimulus money may not gain my full agreement, I appreciate seeing him in interviews saying it just might not work. It&#8217;s the realistic, honest approach that Americans are craving now. Besides, the man has to manage expectations because everyone has put him on a huge pedestal, a phenomenon you described in your post. I&#8217;ve seen him continually downplay that phenomenon, at least with his words. I think he&#8217;s trying his best to avoid letting others prop him up on the wave crest, so that if/when he falls, it won&#8217;t engulf him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Stroup</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2009/02/23/goodness-me/comment-page-1/#comment-8347</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Stroup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/?p=1917#comment-8347</guid>
		<description>Hi Wally,

Yes, that&#039;s true, isn&#039;t it? She is a no-nonsense manager in this sense. It just seems to me that most people think of such companies as typically operated the way Yahoo used to be, rather than as it appears it may be soon.

I agree that the board knew what it was getting, and likely sought it out, specifically.

It should be an interesting period for Yahoo. I know you have some strong opinions regarding the way this company has been managed - I hope you find more positive signs in this change!

Thanks for stopping in with this - an important heads-up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Wally,</p>
<p>Yes, that&#8217;s true, isn&#8217;t it? She is a no-nonsense manager in this sense. It just seems to me that most people think of such companies as typically operated the way Yahoo used to be, rather than as it appears it may be soon.</p>
<p>I agree that the board knew what it was getting, and likely sought it out, specifically.</p>
<p>It should be an interesting period for Yahoo. I know you have some strong opinions regarding the way this company has been managed &#8211; I hope you find more positive signs in this change!</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping in with this &#8211; an important heads-up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wally Bock</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2009/02/23/goodness-me/comment-page-1/#comment-8344</link>
		<dc:creator>Wally Bock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/?p=1917#comment-8344</guid>
		<description>Hey Jim. I think you&#039;re reading the Carol Bartz tea leaves wrong. She was the successful head of a cutting internet business, Autodesk. The style she brings to Yahoo is that same one she used there. I suspect the board knew what it was getting. I also think it may be a good choice after the reign of the Boy King, Jerry Yang.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jim. I think you&#8217;re reading the Carol Bartz tea leaves wrong. She was the successful head of a cutting internet business, Autodesk. The style she brings to Yahoo is that same one she used there. I suspect the board knew what it was getting. I also think it may be a good choice after the reign of the Boy King, Jerry Yang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.497 seconds -->

