<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The star gazer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://managingleadership.com/blog/index.php/2008/03/31/the-star-gazer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2008/03/31/the-star-gazer/</link>
	<description>The strategic role of the senior executive</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:35:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Stroup</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2008/03/31/the-star-gazer/comment-page-1/#comment-4173</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Stroup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/2008/03/31/the-star-gazer/#comment-4173</guid>
		<description>Hello Cam,

Your pointing to the Deming comment in this context is good - a tighter connection than I had seen.

It is right on the money though. The weaknesses inherent in so many hiring/promotion decisions does largely arise from fear (as well as, as you pointed out elsewhere, from simple laziness, and a lack of attention to the longer-term consequences of actions). 

As much as I hate to encourage heroic images of the top boss, this is an area of singular responsibility for that person: establishing a productive executive environment. If cause for fear comes from the top, no manager further down can ameliorate it. But if the boss can drive it out, as Deming said, he or she, in so doing, is discharging a great part of the CEO&#039;s real strategic duties.

Thanks for tying that together for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Cam,</p>
<p>Your pointing to the Deming comment in this context is good &#8211; a tighter connection than I had seen.</p>
<p>It is right on the money though. The weaknesses inherent in so many hiring/promotion decisions does largely arise from fear (as well as, as you pointed out elsewhere, from simple laziness, and a lack of attention to the longer-term consequences of actions). </p>
<p>As much as I hate to encourage heroic images of the top boss, this is an area of singular responsibility for that person: establishing a productive executive environment. If cause for fear comes from the top, no manager further down can ameliorate it. But if the boss can drive it out, as Deming said, he or she, in so doing, is discharging a great part of the CEO&#8217;s real strategic duties.</p>
<p>Thanks for tying that together for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cam Beck</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2008/03/31/the-star-gazer/comment-page-1/#comment-4158</link>
		<dc:creator>Cam Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/2008/03/31/the-star-gazer/#comment-4158</guid>
		<description>The Deming comment has particular weight in this discussion, as fear seems to be the primary motivating factor for companies and the people who run them.

What can be done systematically to change that across the marketplace, rather than just in individual instances in which we are personally involved and vested?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Deming comment has particular weight in this discussion, as fear seems to be the primary motivating factor for companies and the people who run them.</p>
<p>What can be done systematically to change that across the marketplace, rather than just in individual instances in which we are personally involved and vested?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.435 seconds -->

