<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The argument for individual leadership</title>
	<atom:link href="http://managingleadership.com/blog/index.php/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/</link>
	<description>The strategic role of the senior executive</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:35:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why leadership characteristic lists do not create leaders - Part Two &#124; Managing Leadership &#124; Managing Leadership</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/comment-page-1/#comment-5786</link>
		<dc:creator>Why leadership characteristic lists do not create leaders - Part Two &#124; Managing Leadership &#124; Managing Leadership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 05:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/#comment-5786</guid>
		<description>[...] The argument for individual leadership [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The argument for individual leadership [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The lack of consensus on what leadership is makes it difficult to discuss &#124; Managing Leadership</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/comment-page-1/#comment-2781</link>
		<dc:creator>The lack of consensus on what leadership is makes it difficult to discuss &#124; Managing Leadership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/#comment-2781</guid>
		<description>[...] The argument for individual leadership [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The argument for individual leadership [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The problem with the arguement for greater lenience and leeway for leaders &#124; Managing Leadership</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/comment-page-1/#comment-2776</link>
		<dc:creator>The problem with the arguement for greater lenience and leeway for leaders &#124; Managing Leadership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/#comment-2776</guid>
		<description>[...] The argument for individual leadership [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The argument for individual leadership [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why organizations do not need and do not want what leaders have to offer &#124; Managing Leadership</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/comment-page-1/#comment-2774</link>
		<dc:creator>Why organizations do not need and do not want what leaders have to offer &#124; Managing Leadership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/#comment-2774</guid>
		<description>[...] The argument for individual leadership [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The argument for individual leadership [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why you cannot pick leaders based on leadership characteristics &#124; Managing Leadership</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/comment-page-1/#comment-2771</link>
		<dc:creator>Why you cannot pick leaders based on leadership characteristics &#124; Managing Leadership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/#comment-2771</guid>
		<description>[...] The argument for individual leadership [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The argument for individual leadership [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why leadership characteristic lists do not create leaders - Part One &#124; Managing Leadership</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/comment-page-1/#comment-2767</link>
		<dc:creator>Why leadership characteristic lists do not create leaders - Part One &#124; Managing Leadership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/#comment-2767</guid>
		<description>[...] The argument for individual leadership [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The argument for individual leadership [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Stroup</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/comment-page-1/#comment-2249</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Stroup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/#comment-2249</guid>
		<description>Hello Stephen,

Thanks for stopping by, and for your thoughtful addition. I would say that the cornerstone in your list of building blocks for what you call CQ is the statement: &quot;Connect to a strong sense of purpose&quot; - Nothing really survives the failure to do that, because there is no reason to do anything else in the absence of that.

I like your catchphrase - CQ or Collaborative Intelligence - I think it captures perhaps the core issues in the management of people in organizations - that is, in what are, after all, collaborative enterprises.

I look forward to learning more about your thinking by visiting your site, and will pick up your book on my next visit to the States.

Thanks again for your visit, your thoughtful comments, and, certainly, for your work as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Stephen,</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by, and for your thoughtful addition. I would say that the cornerstone in your list of building blocks for what you call CQ is the statement: &#8220;Connect to a strong sense of purpose&#8221; &#8211; Nothing really survives the failure to do that, because there is no reason to do anything else in the absence of that.</p>
<p>I like your catchphrase &#8211; CQ or Collaborative Intelligence &#8211; I think it captures perhaps the core issues in the management of people in organizations &#8211; that is, in what are, after all, collaborative enterprises.</p>
<p>I look forward to learning more about your thinking by visiting your site, and will pick up your book on my next visit to the States.</p>
<p>Thanks again for your visit, your thoughtful comments, and, certainly, for your work as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen James Joyce</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/comment-page-1/#comment-2246</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen James Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/#comment-2246</guid>
		<description>Hello,

This is a very interesting subject that has always been a project of mine, in fact I&#039;ve even wrote a book on a similar subject.  One of the areas that I have been published on is the subject of &quot;Collaborative Intelligence&quot; or (CQ). 

The subject of collaboration in the work place goes hand in hand with individual leadership. 

I try and teach management how to use practical &quot;CQ Tools&quot; and processes that help teams and leaders:

- Attract &amp; retain high quality team members
- Create a sense of meaningful participation
- Collaborate in highly effective ways
- Connect to a strong sense of purpose
- Balance leadership and followship

If you would like to know more about my writings, feel free to go to StephanJamesJoyce.com or feel free to Google my book &quot;Teaching an Anthill to Fetch.&quot; 

I look forward to your future blogs!

Stephen Joyce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>This is a very interesting subject that has always been a project of mine, in fact I&#8217;ve even wrote a book on a similar subject.  One of the areas that I have been published on is the subject of &#8220;Collaborative Intelligence&#8221; or (CQ). </p>
<p>The subject of collaboration in the work place goes hand in hand with individual leadership. </p>
<p>I try and teach management how to use practical &#8220;CQ Tools&#8221; and processes that help teams and leaders:</p>
<p>- Attract &#038; retain high quality team members<br />
- Create a sense of meaningful participation<br />
- Collaborate in highly effective ways<br />
- Connect to a strong sense of purpose<br />
- Balance leadership and followship</p>
<p>If you would like to know more about my writings, feel free to go to StephanJamesJoyce.com or feel free to Google my book &#8220;Teaching an Anthill to Fetch.&#8221; </p>
<p>I look forward to your future blogs!</p>
<p>Stephen Joyce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What the recent Noble Prize for Economics has to teach managers &#124; Managing Leadership</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/comment-page-1/#comment-1496</link>
		<dc:creator>What the recent Noble Prize for Economics has to teach managers &#124; Managing Leadership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/#comment-1496</guid>
		<description>[...] Today, more managers are learning to sow the seeds of decentralization and less control in order to reap the winds of innovation and productivity, trying to direct these winds into their organizational sails. They generally attempt it by what many call &quot;leadership.&quot; But that, itself, is highly problematic, as we saw in our recent series on the topic. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today, more managers are learning to sow the seeds of decentralization and less control in order to reap the winds of innovation and productivity, trying to direct these winds into their organizational sails. They generally attempt it by what many call &#8220;leadership.&#8221; But that, itself, is highly problematic, as we saw in our recent series on the topic. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking for Leaders - No Personality Required &#124; Mission Minded Management</title>
		<link>http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/comment-page-1/#comment-1400</link>
		<dc:creator>Looking for Leaders - No Personality Required &#124; Mission Minded Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://managingleadership.com/blog/2007/10/08/the-argument-for-individual-leadership/#comment-1400</guid>
		<description>[...] Using the definition above, a leader could be a college drop out, a criminal, or a six year old. Those searching for the leadership &#8220;formula&#8221; are missing the point, for a series on this issue click here. One man&#8217;s leader may be another&#8217;s fool. Maybe instead of studying leaders, we should be studying followers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Using the definition above, a leader could be a college drop out, a criminal, or a six year old. Those searching for the leadership &#8220;formula&#8221; are missing the point, for a series on this issue click here. One man&#8217;s leader may be another&#8217;s fool. Maybe instead of studying leaders, we should be studying followers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.462 seconds -->

